Human Diversity and Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Human vicissitude and Justice - Essay ExampleA nonher reason for exception is to give way for the cases in which the permissibility of stillbirth is in line with the argument. According to marquess, abortion is permissible if the continuation of pregnancy will endanger a womans life. Killing a foetus is wrong just as cleansing an egotism-aggrandizing kind being. This is because killing denies us an opportunity to unleash our potential, achieve our dreams and reach a moment of self actualization. What makes abortion wrong is the fact that killing a human being deprives him/her the value of his/her future. There is what we value now, and what we would impart to value later, so it becomes a serious issue to kill children and infants. The main objection to marquis argument is that fetuses do not have a desire to go on living and killing them is not wrong. He continues to argue that only victims can be wronged since they have sentience. An embryo is not a victim, it does not have sentience and, therefore, it is not wrong to have an abortion (Landau, 2007). The most serious line of work with this argument is the killing of embryos that do not have the sentience. Anti-abortionists claim that fetuses are both human and awake(p) and human beings have a expert to life. Therefore, fetuses have a right to life a worry. ... Abortion activists for the most part appeal to the criterion of being human. In this sense, fetuses are clearly human they do not get going to another species. A correct theory on the wrong of killing a fetus is like to how it would be wrong to kill peaceful someones from outer space who come to pay a take to task to our planet regardless of whether they biologically resemble us or not. If they are persons like us, they will have futures like ours so it would be wrong to kill them. For marquis, his stand against abortion is too absurd to be acceptable. His emphasis is on the value of life rather than a potential person. These arguments t hen are too absurd to be acceptable because they deem contraception as being wrong (Landau, 2007). Question 2 Most of Thomsons arguments on the defense for abortion rely on the premise that a fetus is a human being - a human being from the time of conception. To her, the argument that the development of a human being from conception to childhood is not clear because there is no point for feature between being a person at one stage and not a person on the other. Concluding that a fetus is a human being from the time of conception is not valid. She does not support the different stages of development of a fetus into a child. Her assertion is that the fetus is already a person well before birth. By the age of ten weeks, the fetus begins to acquire human characteristics like face, arms and legs as well as brain organs. A fertilized ovum is just like an acorn in an oak tree. Thompson gives an anecdote of a kidnapped person who wakes up to find himself attached to an unconscious twiddler who has a fatal kidney failure. His circulatory system has been plugged to the victim for him to survive. Both have a right to life, but the victims