Natural Law does not provide an adequate basis for morality Essay

In this essay, the arguments made will help to consider whether or non if indispensable even offfulness does provide an adequate cornerst one and only(a) for ethical codes or not. The arguments will look into doubting Thomas theory and if his whimseys provide a sense of virtuousity for every last(predicate) military individualnels. im gentlemanent justness is a chaste theory which fend fors that justice should be based on theology and ethics. innate Law holds that the law is based on whats correct. indispensable Law is discovered by tenderss through the role of reason and choosing betwixt good and evil. It maintains power in discovering certain universal standards in deterrent exampleity and ethics.The strengths that be found in raw(a) Law be the strengths of an absolutist deontological view of righteousness. It aloneows populate to follow common rules so they can thusly structure communities. Natural Law provides justification and support for certain vegetable marrow ideas which are popular in modern time, for example gentlemans gentleman rights and equality. Natural Law provides a clear example basis for Christians to follow, example would be, the primal precepts to defend life which provides a chaste rule to help people to understand that all life is sacred and we should defend all life.We are to a fault able to us our reason in order to pit between what is right and what is wrong, it allows us to use our reason to fulfil our character as humans. A key argument that would be made is that not all people share the same life purposes everyone wants to get roughlything incompatible out of life, fulfilling their own life purposes. Not all people find have it a personal manner in the same way some find love and purpose in life through the expression of their sexuality (Robert Bowie). doubting Thomas did not consider that every human thinks and feels differently, to make his theory relatable to all humans.Human beings hav e their own minds the whole person should be the decisiveness maker and follow what makes them happy. Homosexual men and women argue the fact that they are not recognized as normal human beings. doubting Thomas believed that their actions should not be seen as normal human action precisely as unnatural because to him, they cannot lead normal lives like straight men and women sincere because they cannot reproduce and that Aquinas believed that as a human being mustiness preserve the species every discharge of semen should be associated with life genesis(Robert Bowie).But it is not vital for ever discharge of semen should be producing a in the buff life to maintain human life. Aquinas doesnt consider how are functions effect are emotions, how they link to our emotions and thoughts. Natural Law has been argued to whether or not there is a common natural law that is apparent and self- evident, and also whether or not it can be right for each human and if every day life can be deduc ed from the fundamental laws e. g. primary precepts. Kai Neilson went against Aquinas theory, Neilson argued Aquinas beliefs in a basis human nature which is presented to all different cultures.Sciences view of an essential human nature is that it does not exist and that its not what makes a man a man. Human nature is seen as a vague heathenish concept, is has never been scientifically proven so we cannot be sure if it very does exist. The challenge is that an essential human nature isnt as seemingly self-evident as Aquinas claims (Robert Bowie). In some ways, some framings of Natural Law could perhaps exist just not in the way Aquinas indented. He believed to use the genitals for new(prenominal) reason presides reproducing, was immoral.The human body and emotions works in different ways and it is not demand that semen has to produce a new life every time. Aquinas believes that sex before marriage is wrong, and that in order for a oppose to have sex they must have the intensi ons of spending the rest of their lives together. For a couples relationship to grow strong or maintain strong, by creating a sexual relationship, the couples relationship may benefit from this action. Sexual activity isnt only found in the genitalias (Robert Bowie).In todays society the human physique is seen as one psycho-physical whole, it is no longer seen as the fraction requirements of parts which Aquinas had believed. Aquinas how a couple may bespeak a sexual relationship for their feelings to mature. Times have changed since Aquinass theory, people within a relationship no longer delay until their wed some even have children out of wedlock precisely are in stable relationship even if its with some another(prenominal) person who is not their childs parent.Homosexual relationships are no longer thrown upon and homosexual couples can now get married in church in front of God. Aquinas theory does no longer fit into todays society simple because the new generations have g rown up being taught differently. The programs that are now shown on TV for children and teens to watch have sent out a messages cover sense such as 16 and pregnant that go against Aquinas beliefs. Aquinas Natural Moral Law is a Christian ethic but deliverer confronted legalistic morality in the New Testament.Natural moral law is similar to Pharisaic law and some debate that Jesus went against this approach. Some Christians have demanded that morality should be based on the idiosyncratic rather than the types of acts that have been committed. Writer, Kevin T Kelly, pointed out two types of Christian morality, one that is centred on acts and then another which is centred on the dignity of the human person (Robert Bowie), separating the person from the act. Although natural law has its down sides there are some arguments that provide a basis for morality.Natural moral law provides a set of rules which people do follow to fulfil a moral life. The strengths that natural moral law prov ides are the strengths of an absolutist deontological view of morality the rules that apply bring a structure to communities. Some religious believers use Natural law as a comfort blanket it could be seen as something to rely on to help guide them to a moral way of life, Natural moral law gives a reason to be moral, It gives guidance on day to day questions (Robert Bowie).Natural law, although guides people in the way they live, is not a set of rules but a form of living a chose on how to achieve a persons purpose and happiness. It provides us humans with a complete system of moral living. Natural moral law supports certain ideas in modern times for example human rights and equality. Humans are capable of discerning the deviation between good and evil because they have a conscience. There are many manifestations of the good that we can pursue. Some, like procreation, are common to other nimals, and others, like the pursuit of truth, are inclinations peculiar to the capacities of hu man beings. Some modern Catholic theologians, like John Wijngaards, dispute the Magisteriums interpretation of Natural Law as applied to specific points of sexual ethics, such as in the areas of contraceptives and homosexual unions. Natural moral goes against taking of a humans life, thou shall not kill (Jesus) natural law follows this, the 5 primary precepts state that you should perverse all life, since life is a pay and all humans should find happiness and morality within their lifespan.Although Natural law does provide a framework for humans to be steer it also forgets to include the other types of cultures. Natural law was made for Christians which performer that the rules and morals have been made to fit only Christian teachings, so its not suitable for all humans to follow and if not all human beings can follow it, then not all humans are gaining a basis for morality.Aquinas theory is seen as being out of date, with the new generation growing up in a world where sex before marriage doesnt apply, his belief that no semen should be wasted and that it is unmoral to use the genitals for other reason besides reproducing is no longer seen as wrong but in some cases seen as sharing love between partners also homosexuality is no longer seen as a sin in some societies.